Question
Thursday, January 24th, 2008Aight, fuckers, answer me this: why would someone pay $240 to go to a certain location via train when there is airfare available for $280-320?
Situation: I have a 4-day weekend this weekend, immediately following my 3-day last weekend. I am sick of driving 600 miles with traffic in Bodymore, Murdaland and Connectthedots - pushing the travel time to 11 hours each way - so I thought I’d research other modes of travel. Trains are quaint and relaxing, allowing geeks like me to catch up on my sci-fi and art history reading, but $240 fucking dollars?
I’ma bin the whole idea. If it was Super Bowl weekend that gave me the four days, I’d brave I-95, but two weekends in a row is too much. I just want to know why in the name of Buddha’s blue balls I should pay $240 for round-trip tickets on a mode of locomotion that takes 10+ hours for me to reach my destination.


